Originally Posted by steve64
Runways, unlike slots, are tangible assets.
So FLL decides not to use them and instead "lose them".
What's the FAA gonna do ?? Pack up the runway(s) and move them to another airport
The FAA and/or munincipal bonds have already paid for these runways. It's only fair they demand they be put to use.
As for noise complaints, I wonder how many of these neighborhoods were built after the runways. I don't know the specifics of FLL, but it amazes me how many airports are hit by noise restrictions by communities built after the airport; and whose only reason for their growth over the years has been due to said airport located only a few miles away !!
ok when I said wacko I should have said "informed wacko". I understand about tangible assets (I lecture on them twice a week).
Point is, FAA can decide which runways are usable or not (think about approval process) - also see the followup post about Giant X's. FAA can say "its shut down now, and cant be used for any purpose. think we're bluffing?"
The local residents want the best of both worlds. But everyone has paid for the runways, not just the locals. In fact, with the federal share considered, and the fact that landing fees/etc are used to supplement, the locals have probably paid for less than half.