Originally Posted by
Eastbay1K
I'm still getting used to it! But when the Int'l terminal opened 20-some years ago with A# and G# gates, it was obvious that the master plan was to number the BCDEF. What it does accomplish is eliminating the letters after the gate numbers, because each pier was limited to 10 unique numbers - same as LAX terminals.
It will help at LAX with respect to what now shows as Terminal B on many itineraries - "... is Terminal B?" Bradley, of course, built after the current terminal number sequencing (of course, there wasn't a 1 back then

)
As far as I am concerned, the LAX proposal would make sense only if they were to change the terminal names from numbers to letters and gate labels continued to correspond to the terminal names instead of the councourses. Except for very frequent travelers and aviation nerds, with the exception of the first few concourses, no one is going to remember in which terminals the various lettered concourses are located.