Originally Posted by
RedChili
I have the impression that you confuse the issue of lockdown with the issue of closing borders. They are two separate issues.
Closing borders may have a delaying effect if there's no domestic spread, but once the virus is widespread in the country, closing borders doesn't make any sense at all. Anyway, closing borders isn't necessarily a violation of human rights. For countries that are heavily dependent on incoming tourism, such as Thailand, closing borders can be very damaging to the country and the people.
A lockdown of your population will inevitably be a violation of human rights, and it will usually cause far more damage than closing borders.
I agree that the mortality rate is not the only thing. We're talking about very complex issues. But right now, it's probably the best indicator.
Which section of what human rights convention would be violated by a lockdown?