Originally Posted by
jpezaris
I agree, the new receipt format is fine for swiping view on a phone, but can't be printed easily or submitted for a neat, one-page expense report. It looks like an itinerary, with the emphasis on flight details, rather than a receipt, which should have an emphasis on financial details and information density. I find it's harder to read than the old expert-style receipt which was able to hold all of the ticket information on the first page no matter how long my itinerary was.
Keep in mind that we're talking about receipts not itineraries. I think the email itineraries, which are much more likely to be use and useful on a phone, are perfectly fine. But that format is not OK for a receipt. I'd like to see the old receipt format again.
Yeah, I thought Kirby was so interested in being carbon neutral? Why force us to print multiple pages for expense reports when we used to only need to have one, beautifully dense with information, receipt page? I guess UA hates trees.