FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Building itinerary with Google Flights, but aa.com won't price it
Old Feb 23, 2020 | 10:37 am
  #17  
xliioper
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
2M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: KARB
Programs: DL 2MM
Posts: 26,807
Originally Posted by dylanks
Use ITA Matrix and then ITA-Matrix-Powertools ( ITA-Matrix-PowerTools - Userscript for Orbitz/DL/UA/AA/BA/CZ/IB/LA/LH/LX/TK )... it will find a way to let you book via aa.com, though it may be the Amadeus version of AA. I've booked a few more complex itineraries in this manner.
This doesn't help if the married segment inventory doesn't actually exist which is the root of posters problem. Both ITA and an aa.com search suffer from same problem when trying to use multi-city to specify a particular routing for which there is a covering through fare and it attempts to merge the segments under one fare. The fare search only looks at individual segment bucket availability and ignores married segment bucket inventory which is what applies to the fare availability. If your connections are long enough or they are not valid routings for a single fare, there won't be an issue as the segment can't be merged. It's also not an issue if the married segment availability happens to match the inventory for individual segments. I did a detailed demonstration of the bug here -- Unavailable Routing. (aa.com was quoting a G fare when no G bucket inventory existed on married segments as shown on ExpertFlyer). Married segment inventory is not an optional thing that you can choose to ignore. When ITA Powertools/bookwithmatrix uses an API interface to pull-up a fare on an airline or OTA website, there is no bucket inventory checking done at that point. It's just pulling up whatever fare it's told to pull up. It's only when you go to book that an actual inventory check is done and the fare quote is discovered to be bogus.

Last edited by xliioper; Feb 23, 2020 at 10:54 am
xliioper is offline