Originally Posted by
Dave510
Mandarin Oriental Hong Kong - B+ - I can see why some people love it, but probably not a return visit for me. Great: Location, F&B, housekeeping. Good: Service (but locals vs foreigners are treated differently). Not-so-good: Not a fan of the classic design, but totally subjective.
The Ritz Carlton Hong Kong - A- - Reliable HK pick, as long as you can stand the location. Great: Service, view, hardware. Good: F&B. Not-so-good: Location, the lift (it's fast for the amount of floor it covers, but the time required to get to the room adds up over time).
The Ritz Carlton Kyoto - A+ - Best stay of the year. Great: Service, location, F&B, housekeeping, hardware, activities (especially the bike/hiking tours).
St. Regis Osaka - B - Everything is basically good, but nothing really stands out as great. It's a pleasant hotel in Osaka; nothing more, or less.
Prince Gallery Tokyo - B+ -> B - Great: Hardware, location (not everyone will agree with this one), view. Good: Service, housekeeping. Odd: F&B. Without the access to the lounge and the diminished breakfast offering brings down the hotel a peg.
Four Seasons Seoul - B+ - Great: Hardware, location, Korean sauna, F&B*. Good: Service*. Not-so-good: Cost cutting, toiletry. Service was a big miss on the first visit, but vastly improved to be great for the second stay. F&B and club lounge has seen noticeable cost cutting for the second visit though. And please drop the dove-smelling, made in China toiletry.
It's a brand standard to use Lorenzo Villoresi. FS Kyoto uses the same stuff too. I'm willing to bet the new FS Tokyo Otemachi will as well.
Totally agree about the lounge. It wasn't as good as it was nearer to opening.