Originally Posted by
ikwia
This seems like a reasonable place to post this query...
Can anyone think of a scenario, even if bizarre/unreasonable, where having $100K in annual spend wouldn't merit qualification for CK in your opinion? (note that I am not asking about AA's criteria...I'm asking for your opinion)
IMO, if you flew 400k EQMs or something like that. Basically, you spent a lot, but cost a proportionate amount. If you spent 35k on 4 flights, I'd guess youd be higher up the list for consideration.