Originally Posted by
Genetk44
I don’t believe there were allegations that she was disruptive to crew or passengers...that was either her lawyer or the passenger rights guy using that as an example of a legit reason for an airline to ban a passenger from future service.
I'd just quote from the original CBC article cited in post #1:
Originally Posted by CBC
'Hazard to property' cited
The November letter [from AC] also cited Qian for "prohibited conduct" under the airline's tariff rule that covers "any unusual hazard or risk … to property."
So at least its AC's allegation that there was circumstances involved beyond just the failure to tender payment. Or at least that's my read of it.