Originally Posted by prestonh

OK, show me all of the performance guarantees in the contract (since you can't you are speaking out of nowhere anyways) and the cross-default sub's and 3 legal opinions telling me that there is a 0% chance there are no defaults or cross defaults and then we can have a discussion whether they are binding. We both know the reason UA can kick the can down the road is because Airbus missed its original delivery dates so the whole contract is possibly in technical default anyways...so there's that...

and what does my mother have to do with this? is this a violation of FT terms? very OT