Originally Posted by
s115
Please explain how your example is irrelevant to [MENTION=856218]Some person[/MENTION]s post specifically. I agreed with what [MENTION=856218]Some person[/MENTION]s is saying and can't find anywhere, least of all in this thread where someone has pointed to anything different, except some vague - go and read EUCJ rulings.
It's relevant in the context that it shows why you shouldn't be compensated for individual leg on a trip, but for the whole delay for the whole trip. Anyone who believe I should have been compensated in my example is out of their mind.