Originally Posted by
itsMoe
I'm talking about this article:
https://www.flyertalk.com/articles/e...ets-naked.html
Now, I've gotten used to the "news articles" on FT generally being incredibly lazy two-line summaries of actual news stories, with a link to said story at the end. But in this case, the author apparently found it necessary to link to a post he found while performing activities I don't want to speculate about, presumably because the naked girl in the picture took a selfie in an Emirates A380 F bathroom. The link is described as "To read more about this story, go here", which made me think that I was going to see a news story about someone running naked through the plane, not amateur porn. That's not a link you want to click at work.
Is this really related to Flyertalk and if so, are we to expect weekly news updates on porn clips featuring planes as a setting?
Reddit is not a “porn site”, albeit it does have adults only content.
When you voluntarily clicked the link in the article to see what Reddit offered, you were presented with a warning you apparently chose to override (see below). A person reading FT in the workplace would be presented the same “NSFW” screen you were.
As this is a comment on the news section of FT, we will merge it into the existing, closed thread. Please note the Wikipost at the top of the page, which states, in part:
[QUITE]The FlyerTalk front / home page ...Includes trending "must read" articles, FrugalTravelGuy blog links, "your notifications" list, short listing of pending FT Dos / Meetups, highlighted FT news stories, a short list of FT columns, links trending threads and your subscription information.
Neither the Community Director nor Technical Support personnel are involved with the News section or its production. To provide feedback to FT News columnists, please use the Comment function under the relevant article.
Thank you,
The Technical Support and Feedback forum moderation team[/QUOTE]
JDiver, Co-Moderator
Last edited by JDiver; Aug 15, 2018 at 10:57 am
Reason: Add