Originally Posted by
Boggie Dog
I'm not going to do a thing. Any information I might have is not first hand. I didn't witness the event, I have never met you, traveled through those airports and don't think any testimony on my part would be pertinent to your case. What are they going to do other than make Secret List 95 longer?
I totally agree that you are irrelevant to the case and that I ought not be required to disclose your information.
However, if you want me to not disclose your information — and everything you've ever posted — then please send me an objection.
I don't have the right to object on your behalf. I can say that it's unreasonably broad, ambiguous, irrelevant, disproportionate, burdensome, etc.
for me. I might even be able to assert my own 1st Amendment right of association. I intend to fight the request as much as I can. But I can't assert
your right to privacy.
I didn't make the request for no reason. If you want me to be able to object on your behalf, I need something formal from you with which to do so.
I think a claim that the AUSA is trying to make you jump through hoops just to increase the paperwork load for no good reason is suggestive of harassment. I would at least insert that commentary in any response. The judge might agree.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/1927