This thread is a perfect example of what's wrong with FT. People making all sorts of assumptions and allegations in the absence of any clear facts.
I checked with a couple of sources and there are no non-rev pax in J and one non-rev in PY, the non-rev in PY is not IFS and happens to be male.
So, it seems the 007 partiers are nothing more the revenue paying partiers - the likes of which some here on FT like to encourage and post about. :-/