Originally Posted by
FlyinHawaiian320
You're splitting hairs. You call it inflation, the majority of us (and rightfully so) call it devaluation.
Sorry, but 40-45 going to 50 and 40-45 going to 90 is not "splitting hairs". It's a completely different action. I've already said there is annual inflation, but massive 50% devaluation is not going to happen. With which part of my statement don't you agree? Or do you consider moving from 45K-50K to be "massive devaluation", in which case justabout every program has "massive devaluation" every year or two and the phrase becomes meaningless.
btw, saying "no way 40 will go to 35" is pretty meaningless when not one said it would.