Originally Posted by
WWads
It’s hard to justify not serving the first row lol.
What happens if someone in C+ were to request a drink?
Originally Posted by
StayingHomeIsBetter
Remind me please... when are the 200s supposed to be gone?
[light at end of tunnel]
Be careful what you wish for: no fifty seater aircraft would mean no or reduced DL service to a number of smaller airports.
Originally Posted by
hotshot265
Nothing about row 1 on a CRJ 200 is comfort anything. Row 2 or 3 is my choice, especially if you luck out and have the row of 2 seats to yourself. First time I experienced C+ on this plane last year sometime and ordered a drink, FA charged me for it. I said cocktails are free in C+, she said that was news to her. Didn’t argue...not worth it for $8 or whatever.
Did you complain to DL and request a refund? That's how FAs are educated.
Originally Posted by
Ryno1234
BROKEN RECORD ALERT:
I have ranted about the 200 many many times on this board. Yes, they provide service to airports that normally would not have it. I get it. Thats wonderful.
- I live in Dayton, but i regularly drive to CVG just to avoid the 200 to DTW and MSP. The only issue is a trip to PHL that is only served by a 200.
-The first row of a 200 is horrible. No room, no real benefit. I have asked to be "downgraded" back to row 8(exit) more times than I can count.
- I travel a TON but am no expert on aircraft selection. having said that: it would be so nice if the 200 was replaced with CRJ 700 or 900. It cant be that much of a difference in runway length needed so it could still serve the smaller airports.
Rant over. #retirethe200
It's more a matter of right sizing the aircraft or in other words capacity discipline.
Originally Posted by
WWads
Row 1 is fine as long as there’s an empty next to you.
Almost every seat on almost every aircraft type is fine for a short flight if the seat next to you is blocked.