FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Delta Wants To Be 797 Launch Customer
View Single Post
Old Feb 18, 2018, 5:33 pm
  #84  
ATOBTTR
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Back in Reds Country (DAY/CVG). Previously: SEA & SAT.
Programs: DL PM 1MM, AA PLAT, UA Silver, Marriott Bonvoy Titanium
Posts: 10,349
Originally Posted by readywhenyouare
We've been through flight 1549 before. They got very lucky. The same system that worked in their favor could have just as well have ended very badly. Luckily they had enough altitude to trade for airspeed. But when the Airbus senses a loss of airspeed it will pitch the nose down. Had they run low on airspeed they could have taken a dive into the Hudson. Fortunately they didn't.
I'll stick with the facts of the NTBS report. Thanks.
US 1549 NTSB Report
The airplane’s airspeed in the last 150 feet of the descent was low enough to activate the alpha-protection mode of the airplane’s fly-by-wire envelope protection features. The captain progressively pulled aft on the sidestick as the airplane descended below 100 feet, and he pulled the sidestick to its aft stop in the last 50 feet, indicating that he was attempting to raise the airplane nose to flare and soften the touchdown on the water. The A320 alpha-protection mode incorporates features that can attenuate pilot sidestick pitch inputs. Because of these features, the airplane could not reach the maximum AOA attainable in pitch normal law for the airplane weight and configuration; however, the airplane did provide maximum performance for the weight and configuration at that time.
The Airbus simulation indicated that the captain’s aft sidestick inputs in the last 50 feet of the flight were attenuated, limiting the ANU response of the airplane even though about 3.5° of margin existed between the airplane’s AOA at touchdown (between 13° and 14°) and the maximum AOA for this airplane weight and configuration (17.5°). Airbus’ training curricula does not contain information on the effects of alpha-protection mode features that might affect the airplane’s response to pilot sidestick pitch inputs. The flight envelope protections allowed the captain to pull full aft on the sidestick without the risk of stalling the airplane.
https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/...ts/AAR1003.pdf
ATOBTTR is offline