FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Why ITO-LAX, not ITO-SFO?
View Single Post
Old Oct 26, 2017 | 9:12 am
  #17  
jasondc
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,309
no

LAX-ITO was not something that CO was flying prior to the merger. The SFO/LAX-ITO were put in after the merger, and eventually only the LAX-ITO has remained.

Originally Posted by 1k-all-the-way
My question exactly.... I usually go SFO/KOA since I don't like the connections or timing of LAX/ITO. IIRC LAX/ITO was an old CO route that they just kept on.....
jasondc is offline