Originally Posted by
corporate-wage-slave
I think 2 years, particularly if it is a boy, is probably too old.
Usually if I puzzle over a remark I can't parse for long enough, I come up with an answer.
But this one, not.
I hereby bite the bait and ask the question: what's the catch with a 2-year-old and their gender — is it like pensions, with a different age limit depending on the gender of the passenger? Why is it particularly relevant when the infant is a boy?
Yours interestedly rather than pedantically, T.