Originally Posted by
MSPeconomist
However, under this theory, he stayed on for a long time after being overruled. Was it a sense of responsibility/loyalty to Hyatt? Or could he have been hoping to convince them to wind back some of the worst changes?
Perhaps he was the only thing preventing WoH from being even worse?
Or perhaps Hyatt is in advanced negotiations to be purchased/merged, and he knows he will not have a place going forward?