Originally Posted by
Newly Wed
So they didn't really know what they were dealing with, but they knew it was serious enough to warrant an unplanned landing, but they chose not to land at the nearest airport because another had better ground handling services?? I'd be seriously pissed if I had been on that plane that they didn't get on the ground at the earliest opportunity.
seriously. something is really fish here. something really doesn't make sense. i know others have slandered and assaulted (
) other users for saying this reeks of some type of employee strike, but really what other possible explanation can there be? i mean if it was truly an emergency they would have landed in calgary..