Originally Posted by
irishguy28
The guy was a random passer by; it was not necessary from a news standpoint to enable him to be identified. An angle from the rear of the car would just as well have shown the "reality" of what is happening at Schiphol.
You could probably make a case that this is not, per se, a "news" photo at all.
But isn't the point to show that random passers by are subject to questioning.... and how were you able to identify him?
And picture wise this doesn't compare to what was in the newspaper, amateur hour (to be blunt

).