FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Thoughts on the decline of SQ First
View Single Post
Old Mar 23, 2016 | 4:00 am
  #16  
OnTheCentreline
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 118
Originally Posted by lokijuh
A question, does SQ operate in the right markets to maintain a full bells and whistles F service, like AF and LH (who have access to the lucrative transatlantic market), or like the cashed up ME carriers?

So often you read of people liking SQ F because they have an empty cabin, one seat for sleeping and one for sitting - and these are on awards. How on earth do they make money on F if this is the case? Or is it simply a loss leader?

Basically the main market I would have thought SQ F now is Australia/SE Asia - Europe or SE Asia-North America. Outside those basic geographies you can get good non-stop services on a whole range of carriers and paid F (I assume) is less price sensitive, so people are more inclined to take a more expensive non-stop than backtracking through SIN, to get from say Shanghai to London.

We've also seen the reduction in 77W from 8 to 4 seats.

I'm being a bit provocative, but is the writing on the wall for SQ F?
You raise an important question. However, I don’t have the answer!

Except to say that where we would have travelled to (SIN to) FRA on SIA first, we are now considering C-class to DUS on the A350 – whether we make that change is still under consideration, but given the dumbing down of F-class, it’s certainly looking more inviting.
OnTheCentreline is offline