Originally Posted by
ysolde
I am one of the weirdos who really likes Krug (not a prestige thing -- I actually consistently choose it in blind tastings). OTOH, I know nothing about champagne, so I don't know what it is about Krug that makes it so appealing to me. Given the choice among normal champagnes, I go for Dom. My husband finds it much too dry. So we usually compromise and end up with a Veuve NV rose, which is less dry, somewhat fruity, but the bubbles are still . . . bubbly (I don't know the word I am looking for, sorry).
Since I am not usually one to drink more than a glass, and that only at special occasions (I am not the biggest of creatures), compromise is the name of the game.
But I would love to know what qualities Krug has that make it so different (to my palate, at least).
It's funny/interesting that you would refer to Dom as a "normal" champagne. I can relate to your comment. I don't know what makes Veuve Clicquot special, but I know I like it better than Dom. But if VC is not available, then drinking Dom is "acceptable" to me.