FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - False positives at security control?
View Single Post
Old Oct 9, 2015 | 1:19 am
  #14  
cbn42
Moderator: Manufactured Spending
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 6,707
Originally Posted by seadog83
By far the best example of this is liquids. Going through security you see a great big garbage bin filled with fluids tossed away. Under the guise that they are potential explosives.

Now what would happen if someone tried to bring *actual* liquid explosives through in a water bottle? They would get tossed in the bin with the rest, and no one would give it a second look.

So now you have a situation where either we have to treat every single liquid filled bottle (the vast majority of which are harmless) as a live explosive (shut down airport, evacuate, bring in bomb squad, etc) or treat every single liquid filled bottle, as well a water filler bottle. The former wastes huge amounts of resources, the latter completely discounts the threat of actual explosives.
It would be very difficult to bring a spontaneously explosive liquid up to the checkpoint. The concern with liquids on planes is that they can be used to make explosives on board. This would require mixing them in a certain way, injecting them into a pressurized container with a syringe, and having some sort of flame to detonate. Most potentially explosive liquids that are tossed into the bin with the others are completely harmless sitting there until discarded.
cbn42 is offline