FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - UA looking at the E190-E2
View Single Post
Old Jun 8, 2015 | 8:12 pm
  #22  
3Cforme
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Programs: DL 1 million, AA 1 mil, HH lapsed Diamond, Marriott Plat
Posts: 28,190
Originally Posted by PushingTin
Definately. The seats are way more comfortable on a 175 than the slimlines, though on the face of it they similar in construction? The 175 seat (I've had only 3-4 flights in the last 300) that I had a month ago was nice.
A 175 in a 76-seat config is comfortable. UAX has 175s in a 76-seat config because that's the max allowed for regional carrier ops. One can note that there are major elements of the RJ contract that follow DL 6/2012 pretty closely, including the 'add a new mainline type for more 76-seat RJs' feature.

A 175 in a 76-seat config is comfortable. We don't know how many seats UA might want to cram into a 190 or 90-E2, slimlines or worse. It might well wind up with fewer F seats than today's 175. AA is receiving A319s with just 8F.
3Cforme is offline