Originally Posted by
IntlRabbit
Well put. Another supression of expresssion by non-government actors. The usual legal recourse is not in play and social media are often the sole outlet for this nonsense. The airlines response is as telling as the actions of their agent, basically, "Move along now, nothing to see here".
Nonsense.. The guy can always sue if he felt WN violated the terms of their agreement. Of course, if you read the terms and conditions, you will see WN is covered. There is no protected class issue here. It's not like he was discriminated against for religious reasons for having a shirt that said "Allahu Akbar". "Profanity speakers" is not a protected class.