Originally Posted by
SkiAdcock
I'd like to see the verbiage that koko mentioned re: minor be incorporated in 4.B.v, about a friendly amendment not changing the intent of the motion etc. If you're going to change the guidelines to formalize a friendly amendment process, then being a bit more specific ala koko's verbiage (without having to do into detailed definitions trying to cover every item) would clarify/formalize what is meant by minor/friendly and I think would gather support by FTers. Otherwise you're back to the what does minor mean discussion.
Cheers.
The notion is that the maker, seconder and to-date 'yes' voters can decide by unanimous consent whether it is actually minor or not.
I think I am ok with that, as it's a pretty high bar.