Originally Posted by
bdschobel
I would not be embarrassed by full disclosure of my voting details. I don't understand why anyone would. Maybe I do vote too quickly on occasion, but that doesn't embarrass me. Likewise, anyone who votes slowly shouldn't feel embarrassed, unless he or she is delaying just to be obstinate.
Bruce
I wouldn't care either, but I don't see the point of amending the TB guidelines for a time stamp.
We already have the public announcement of when a motion will pass/not pass. We already have the list of who voted yes/no/abstain when all votes are done. I'm trying to think of what pressing benefit to FT is accomplished by knowing that someone voted at 2:53 am on (pick any date in the 2-week period).
Amending the guidelines to formalize a friendly amendment to a motion process I understand. Amending them to add a time stamp ranks up there with the seriously, this is what TB concerns itself w/ chain of thought IMO.
Cheers.