Originally Posted by
kipper
Then define minor/friendly in the process (leaving it open can only cause problems later), or simply vote it down if it needs to be changed, and present a new motion.
This is what I've been saying. It shouldn't be left open for whoever is TB president to unilaterally determine what changes are minor or even "technical" (with the latter category of changes presumably not even requiring the approval of anyone else, including the person who made the motion, the person who seconded it, and anyone who has already voted yes).