Originally Posted by
lin821
I do like the practice of inviting comments on a TB proposal before any motion is made in the private TB Forum, just like what koko did back in 2008 with the new TB Guidelines. At least FTers wouldn't be surprised what a motion turned out in the end.
I am not dismissing the need to fix typos in TB motions. Nobody is perfect after all. Having said that, rather than working on an amendment process, I rather see formalizing such TB motion-making process first, so we can be more certain no hasty motion is made.
Agree with the above.
Originally Posted by
kipper
You want a process to change typos? Then replace minor with typos. You want a way to change a motion? Kill the motion and propose a new one.
Agree. Although Gawd help us if we need a friendly amendment process just to correct typos for crikey's sake. There needs to be some common sense involved.
Cheers.