Originally Posted by
tigertanaka
I agree, particularly if you are a KL flyer regularly transiting in AMS as lounge access is a major plus.
[...] Clearly you would have to be desperate for the segments to voluntarily transfer at CDG but it might be an option for people.
I'm not sure I'm following either of those two arguments?
On the first, in what sense is it more useful if you regularly fly kl via Ams than say, AF via CDG or Az via fco etc?
On the second, if your argument is about transiting in general then we agree but it seems a bit of a truism, if it's about cdg I'm not sure why you'd say that? To Schengen youd basically stay in the same terminal and go straight to departure. About 5min gate to gate just as in AMS. If to non Schengen on AF or partners, I currently prefer cdg as at least you don't reclear security from Schengen while you do at ams because of gate security. Of course when the ams work on centralised security finishes ams will be better but not now.