Originally Posted by
restlessinRNO
I have a slightly different view. Yes, every week there is one of these post about how bad UA international F is. Yes, the OP could have read these reports. But I feel his comments are valuable. :-: It clarifies that nothing has changed. And I feel he raises legitimate issues. He basically had a paid F ticket.
He was not able to have a single glass of champagne, because UA only stocked one bottle. I didn't know there were no slippers in F on HKG flights. Undoubtedly, he will not pay for UA International F again.
Seriously - UA can't afford to stock more than one bottle of the good stuff for GF? That's really cheap.
Originally Posted by
StingWest
Agree! It's all about the personal space, and that seat is great to sleep in. Actually, I think the food in both BF and GF is fine, but I understand that's a personal judgement. It seems that the fish dishes re generally better than the steak.
Agree with all of the above. While the food is fine, the wine up front continues to be barely drinkable swill. Flew UA to Europe and OS back, both in business, and the difference was amazing. Austrian offers a wide selection of good wine, and they actually board the wines listed on the menu.
Originally Posted by
cerealmarketer
Look forward to getting a better business class product overall if first ever disappears.
How does that figure? All the expense being directed at the GF results in shortchanging the BF product? In what universe?
