Originally Posted by
jackal
The system as I see it being proposed here (and before
SkiAdcock tries to challenge me on this, I'll clarify
) by
nsx, who is the chief proponent of this idea and without whose blessing no proposal will likely move forward, works pretty much exactly liek Facebook's. So how can Facebook's implementation not be gamed but this one can? Why can't we create one that can't be gamed here? That seems to be exactly what is being proposed here.
On Facebook, most have a limited scope of who can see/like/comment on posts. As such, the potential for gaming is reduced. Here, there isn't a a limited scope of who can see/like/comment on posts in most forums.