Originally Posted by
jackal
Originally Posted by
goalie
Let's try it this way....
Member#1 makes a post
Member#2 clicks and marks the post as helpful
Members 3, 4, & 5 report the post saying the post is not helpful
Moderators review the post and while not helpful, it is accurate post and within ToS (i.e. "sorry, and no matter what you may think, what the agent told you is correct"*)
Is a moderator supposed to "un-helpful" the post?
*sorry, and I know there's a better example, but that's the best I can come up with on a lazy Saturday night sleep deprived Sunday
No. Are you advocating they should? Why should they? You're intimately familiar with "Likes" on Facebook--no one has the power to remove "Likes" there, and that system works just fine.
I think this is a perfectly workable system:
Bolding mine: And that's all I asked and you are the only TB member to actually answer my question ^ as I do not think moderators should be in the business of un-helpfulling a post.
Now as to facebook and likes and flyertalk and likes, yes it does work on facebook (even when it's raining
) but afaik, there isn't a way to game the system on facebook and as has been discussed numerous times in this thread, a) this is not facebook and b) this is flyertalk where gaming the system is a way of life