Originally Posted by
jackal
Also, I think the deliberate non-inclusion of a "dislike" or "unhelpful" button will limit the harmful effects of any gaming that may go on. I don't understand the (fortunately few) people who have advocated for the inclusion of such in this thread.
I really think people should quit bringing up the "horrendous scandal" that happened back in RP's days with the reputation feature. It's comparing apples-to-oranges. The old one had a vote-up/vote-down feature and applied to the member himself/herself across FT. The new system as it's being proposed only has the ability to leave positive feedback on a specific post. If post ratings are applied to posts only and not to members, and if the worst thing that can happen is that someone's post does not get voted up, then I really fail to see how such scandalous behavior can possibly ensue.
Agree 100%. Without the
negative version of the feature ("hot helpful" in this instance) I think the feared (one might even say, fear-mongered) "gaming" -- talk about an overused, nondescript expression-- won't be anywhere near the issue that it was with "reputation." Where people took their old grudges against members out from he day it was turned on.
Put differently, if people want to mark a post/poster as "helpful" how does that impact those who -don't- get (or want) such "votes"? If they don't care, shouldn't they just not care?