Originally Posted by
zozeppelin
I feel dirty even using this as a reference
Gary is, in fact, a well-established blogger and we find your characterization to be inappropriate.
Originally Posted by
zozeppelin
"So they decided it was too costly for them to support given its use, at least that’s their explanation."
Originally Posted by
zozeppelin
"occasionally add/remove features based on customer demand."
His explanation is, actually, consistent with the explanation, provided by the representative in that the decision was driven by [
insufficient] "customer demand"/"use" of the non-core feature in question.
Originally Posted by
PreferBulkhead
Some interesting quotes from the blogger and the comments in the blog
In contrast, a comment by an anonymous poster "Steve" is speculative and baseless.