FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - IAH-MUC/MUC-IAH Going To Last Long?
View Single Post
Old Aug 12, 2014 | 8:43 pm
  #14  
bmwe92fan
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: NYC / TYO / RSW Up in the Air avoiding the Snowflakes
Programs: UA GS 1.8MM, AA 2.1MM, EK, BA, SQ, CX, Marriott LT, Accor P
Posts: 8,058
Originally Posted by 787fan
I agree MUC is a cleaner experience than FRA
Agree -- and it's not even close. FRA is an aging airport that is gradually being brought up to modern standards. If you come in at the right place and your connecting flight is close then it is manageable - but if you don't it's a challenge. Last week I really had to hustle through FRA as I came in to the "wrong" terminal -- and to say it's a long haul and a pain getting around FRA is an understatement.... I always choose MUC if I can - incredibly efficient and operates really well - just less flights from places I come and go from in central Europe...
bmwe92fan is offline