FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Family Asked To Leave Southwest Flight After Tweet
Old Jul 24, 2014, 8:55 am
  #162  
ursine1
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 6,286
Originally Posted by toomanybooks
I would not be surprised if someone at WN had bent rules for him before. That's the problem with bending rules; people start to think of that as an entitlement or normal deal.

From the ABC story online:

"A Southwest representative called Watson after the incident, and informed him that A-list members' priority treatment doesn't apply to family members.

"I looked on their website and I didn't find any explicit rule," Watson said."

Must not have searched too hard. The Google search string

family boarding site:southwest.com

brings up the list of rules as link 1. #7 is the "explicit rule" he is looking for:

"An adult traveling with a child four years old or younger may board during Family Boarding, which occurs after the "A" group has boarded and before the "B" group begins boarding. However, those Customers holding an "A" boarding pass should still board with the "A" boarding group."

Admittedly, there is some of the normal WN T&C ambiguity there, where with that last sentence you could debate whether "those Customers" includes minor children, since children presumably cannot agree to T&Cs themselves. But if the GA or OA tells you to board after A, that's what you do.

And his kids are both older than 4 anyway. Case closed.

Searching the A-List benefits shows no exception to the above.
Why do people (Southwest's media department included) keep mentioning Family Boarding? Family Boarding doesn't apply here. At all. His children are over 4.

The section that does apply is this one:

Can groups assigned to different boarding positions board together?
Yes. However, in order to maintain the integrity of the boarding process, we ask that earlier boarding positions board with the later positions. For example, if a passenger is assigned position A16 and wants to board with a passenger assigned position A45, the passenger holding the A16 boarding pass should board with the A45 passenger.
While this incident opens up a bigger conversation about Southwest's unique boarding system (and the issues it creates), and their treatment of elite passengers, ultimately that not the point here. At all.

The point is that an employee made a passenger delete a tweet as a requirement for travel.

Which is 100%, unequivocally wrong.
ursine1 is offline