Originally Posted by
Dave Noble
I disagree that it is a disgraceful response. It is a response which has addressed EK's position on the matter and how it believes it is in compliance with EU261
Whether or not it is ( I cannot see that it is ) is something to take to Sweden's equivalent of a small claims court and get a ruling .
It's more the tone than the content that I was referring to. All he had to do was state EKs perception of the rules, and finish with "I wish to advise you that this is our final position on the matter".