FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Haswell ultrabook vs large tablets
View Single Post
Old Jun 5, 2013 | 12:03 pm
  #8  
nkedel
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
2M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: in the vicinity of SFO
Programs: AA 2MM (LT-PLT, PPro for this year)
Posts: 19,784
Originally Posted by gobluetwo
But isn't the whole point to have one device that fulfills both functions equally well, so you don't need both?
For some, yes, all other things being equal, a single device that does both is better -- fewer things to carry, no need to synchronize apps/content between the two, etc.

For some other folks, all other things being equal, the utility of having two devices outweighs advantages of having a converged device.

Not that things are likely to be equal in this generation; while lighter and more power-efficient than convertible devices based on Ivy Bridge, and a lot faster than the Atom-based ones, Haswell-based devices are still going to be bigger, heavier, and more expensive than most Arm-based (and the smaller Atom-based devices.) They're also going to be a heck of a lot faster.

Before we've got a true best-of-both-worlds device, we're starting to get devices converging from either side.

--

As someone with a lot more use for an ultrabook/subnotebook than a larger tablet, something like the Lenovo S230u Twist or the Gigabyte mentioned here is ideal for me -- mostly a laptop, but usable as a slate when space is very tight or when I need to read/review documents in portrait mode. Someone who needed to use it more heavily in tablet mode would likely find either one quite heavy/bulky compared to a removable keyboard solution.
nkedel is offline