Originally Posted by
CrazyJ82
I'd say it really depends on what your friend hopes/needs to get out of a program. Even though both are OWE, they offer very different benefits, no?
I know more about MPO than BAEC, but as I understand it:
-- Seat guarantee is more generous for Y flyers in MPO than in BAEC. On CX, the OWS/OWE-equivalent tiers can guarantee into lower coach booking classes, while in BAEC it's only full-fare Y.
-- If he misses DM one year and ends up as a GO, he can still pre-reserve exit seats on CX, which I don't think is possible for BAEC's OWS equivalent level.
-- RDM tier bonuses don't exist in MPO but do in BAEC. Although with BAEC redemptions require huge surcharges (CX surcharges are merely big

)
I think it matters a lot which carrier he's likely to fly the most (CX also offers more frequencies at different times on HKG-LHR-HKG). I personally would lean toward MPO because the tier benefits are quite helpful. But if redeemable miles factor into the equation at all and he's willing to fly mostly on the BA flights, BAEC could still be attractive even at the OWS-equivalent level.
Agree with the part of RDM. Not sure whether it is useful to you, but a 100% tier bonus is rather a large sum!
AFAIK, BAEC redemptions require huge surcharges only if you redeem BA-operated flights, but not on CX or other OW flights. I think I need someone to clarify on this probably.
And adding top on it, generally BA has a lower miles required for redemption than CX.
For example, BA needs 9,000 Avios while CX needs 15,000 Avios for a R/T HKG/TPE Y-class.
If you travel on CX mainly, there is no doubt that you should apply for MPO rather than BAEC.