Originally Posted by
uastarflyer
CO keeps [messing] with real UA ops
Make that United changing United's ops. There is no CO vs. UA when it comes to making aircraft utilization decisions, and, as you may have realised - this is the "real" UA now - there is only one.
in Asia only to reverse course later. Like the HKG 737 fail.
*One* change = "keeps"?
Will you only be happy if PMUA aircraft operate all former PMUA Asian routes? You are setting yourself up for disappointment there.
Hopefully this happens once again.
Why? There obviously isn't the demand for F. Otherwise they would, you know, keep it.
Removing F service to NRT - where are they moving it to?
Removing it *from* LAX-NRT - you left out the most important part of that sentence, LAX. Just not enough demand obviously, or more profitable business elsewhere.
Or they're just doing it to make you angry
Originally Posted by
warreng24
Makes sense. I can see most of the premium F traffic being pushed to SQ anyway.
I believe this has already happened on a large scale, hence the change.
Originally Posted by
uastarflyer
No doubt the plan is to eliminate F class worldwide as the PMUA planes age out.
That would appear to be smart advice for any airline that isn't willing to invest what BA, SQ, EK, etc. do in their intl. F products.