So a lack of evidence means we should take a clearly biased article at face value without questioning whether it's manufactured outrage?

When I was in the restaurant business we had at least 5-10 scammers a year extort the restaurant chain for money or free food, it was incredibly hard to "prove" and not worth defending because of the possible PR backlash.

Even the most well documenting companies will have ambulance chasers and scammers knocking at their doors for publicity, cash, or just to stick it to them.

I'm not saying companies do no wrong, I am saying stories like this need to be taken with a healthy dose of skepticism.

I'd say unless she proves that she was kicked off for cleavage and not because she's a raging .... who was arguing with the employees that she was not kicked off because of a dress code.

And hell, if they want to have a dress code what's the big deal? I for one don't want to see old guys in bikinis sitting next to me and I sure as hell don't want to be sandwiched between "larger" people wearing short shorts and spaghetti straps.

[Off topic text deleted by Moderator.]