FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Cities with highest number of restaurants per capita; San Francisco is #1 by far
Old Aug 4, 2012 | 5:55 pm
  #11  
Eastbay1K
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Countries Visited
3M
Conversation Starter
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Over the Bay Bridge, CA
Programs: Jumbo mas
Posts: 42,475
Originally Posted by whackyjacky
W of Park Presidio SF is primarily single family homes. A lot of people live out there & there aren't a ton of restaurants. It's more like an outer borough. IMO, the high # of tourists = the high # of restaurants.
Not primarily for tourists ... SF is like the "Downtown" of the Bay Area - where LA Downtown, Houston Downtown, etc etc. have not much of a "there" there in metro areas of significant sprawl, and the cities themselves are huge. SF has a disproportionately high number of services for a relatively low residential population, which swells on a daily basis by a few hundred thousand people.

As much as the Sunset and Richmond districts of SF are primarily SFR, absent a few tony neighborhoods, they are quite dense, and don't offer much in the front or back yard department.
Eastbay1K is offline