Originally Posted by
PTravel
First of all, "innocent until proven guilty," is a misstatement of the legal standard, which is, "the state bears the burden of proving guilt." It does not mean someone is innocent until proven guilty, but that, before they can be deprived of life, liberty or property in the context of a criminal action, the state must meet its burden of proof.
TSA is not on trial. TSA is a government agency that, time and again, has demonstrated incompetence, corruption, scientific and technolgoical ignorance, and contempt for the Constitution of the United States. TSA has wasted billions of dollars and contributed virtually nothing to the safety of commercial aviation. The three known terrorist attacks against US aviation since 9/11 were not detected, much less contravened, by TSA.
So, please -- spare me, "innocent until proven guilty." As I said, TSA is not on trial.
Oh I understand the concepts, quite well I might add.
But please feel free to point that out to your fellow posters when they make like remarks concerning the TSA's screening. Or do you feel that you cannot cite the law in such instances because of your personal bias?