Originally Posted by
bankops
In case you are not used to TSORon's modus operandi on FT:
- Attempt to develop credibility through the estabishment of credibility and pass yourself off as a "professional".
- Use a minimum of coherent text after the initial attempt at establishing credibility
- Attempt to destroy the credibility of any detractors and dissenters by calling into question their credentials or professional qualifications, either in a direct [is not a lawyer] or indirect [if you were what you say you are, then you would know].
- Continue to politely erode everybody else's credibility, because at the end of the day, the topic has been derailed which is the primary goal anyway.
All harmless fun, until one persons falls into the trap and goes away thinking that the TSA is actually making them safe. Oh well. Let's continue the banter.
It's worse than that. You forgot about the claims that cannot be backed up, and are then dropped down the memory hole, such as the one referenced here:
Since I [BubbaLoop] seem to miss "quite a bit" of your information, could you please point me exactly to the part in which a test strip (not an electronic "sniffer" like the one you showed here, which, by the way, also does not detect peroxides) waved above a solution is capable of detecting peroxides.