FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - testing eye drops
View Single Post
Old Jul 12, 2012 | 7:20 am
  #87  
GaryD
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: LGA, JFK
Posts: 1,022
Originally Posted by TSORon
So, you use the name bubbaloop here as well, since that is who's credentials I am questioning. Interesting, I believe that is a TOS violation, but I'll leave that determination up to the mods.
You had written:

Impressive credentials? What credentials? He has provided nothing in that area.
Then I reminded you of his (BubbaLoop's) credentials.

Are you suggesting, one Flyertalk member cannot buttress the credibility of another? Or, are you using some kind of silly "divide and conquer" tactic?

Originally Posted by TSORon
Actually they can detect peroxide vapors, they need only be programed to do so.
If they can detect "peroxide vapors," they can detect "peroxides," of course. So the issue is, where is the evidence, among the dozens of pages you linked to, as BubbaLoop asked.

Originally Posted by TSORon
As for the rest, read the other thread started by bubba. You indeed have missed quite a bit, and I’m reasonably certain that your knowledge even given your profession, is not universally comprehensive. No one’s is.
You can't pull that one again, pal. The pending question is, where is the "bit" that BubbaLoop (and now I) have "missed"? Remember?

I'll soon be obliged to conclude that neither of us has "missed" anything at all.

Originally Posted by TSORon
Test strips detect chemicals, right? Liquids have vapors (generally speaking of course), right? And you are of the opinion that a test strip cannot be made to detect the chemicals in those vapors? Riiiight.
That's not what I wrote. Thanks in part to your own tactics, I am now of the opinion that a test strip cannot be made to detect peroxide vapors. @:-)

Originally Posted by TSORon
My tactics have nothing to do with the facts. As a “scientist” you should know this. OTOH, opinions and blind intentional ignorance can have a significant effect on one’s perception the facts can’t they. You might want to explore that a bit. Scientists are supposed to be objective, and tactics have nothing to do with that objectivity.
Have I struck a nerve, ever so slightly? Is this really your response to my assertion that: "There appears to be no evidence that those test strips can detect peroxides, among the documents that you linked to." ?
GaryD is offline