Originally Posted by
Travelsonic
Being over analytical here, but if you use privacy in any way, this is bs - as it is for any privacy appreciating human soul - privacy IS hiding.
I appreciate that point and definitely find the "nothing to hide" argument asinine vis-a-vis citizens' privacy rights against government intrusion. What I'm talking about is my interactions with private employees of whatever business I'm patronizing on their property. In other words, if an FA wants to question my reading materials, I'm happy to explain my pure motives. But I'd just rather not risk freaking out an overly sensitive FA. Good?