Isn't the idea of a better defined Moderator process an even better idea as we have seen things get way out of hand. It is the very arbritary moderation we currently have and the ability of members to plant "flame bombs" that I think cause many of these problems. It is easy to talk about the problems. I have suggested elected Moderators, it has been suggested to me that we could rotate moderators from board to board over time. What other suggestions do members have? Or do you think that we do not have a problem at all?

------------------
dallasflyer