Originally Posted by
Jenbel
But, it would be really rather more professional to do it without mud slinging.
I'm not sure how the smart comments are really good coming from someone who in this role is in a leadership position - if that's your view of what FT should be, then I'm not sure I want it perpetuated. If the only way you can argue is by disparagement, that's going to be rather entertaining for us to read, but actually, won't be that productive. You need to learn to work with each other despite personal differences.
Speaking of mudslinging, I dont see any disparagement from RichMSN. But he was elected by the membership, while moderators are not, so if there is to be a discussion of the roles of leadership, that might be a fine place to start.
I do think that certain people are heavily invested in a status quo. They may have a tussle on their hands.
Democracy is messy, but it is also effective.